A great. 8-2-181 turned effective on the , whereas Taylor Bean produced the loan inside
Because the day of your loan is the important date during the choosing if or not Appellee-allege are included in 1322(b)(2), come across Jackson, 2005 WL 1563529 , at the *4, the latest Court finds out you to definitely O
Also, in deciding if or not Appellants’ mobile house is actual otherwise private assets, the new Legal have to look to relevant state legislation, which in this case is Georgia law. Come across Burner v. All of us, 440 U.S. 48 , 5.5, 99 S.Ct. 914 , 59 L.Ed.2d 136 (1979) (“Assets passions are available and you will defined by condition rules”) look for and Kennedy v. Way Food, Inc. (Within the re also Kennedy), 192 B.R. 282 , 287 (Bankr. Meters.D.Ga 1996).
Appellants vie one to O.C.Grams.An effective. 8-2-181. that was introduced of the Georgia Legislature into the 2003, overrules From inside the re also Washington. It is undeniable you to definitely Appellants don’t document a certification out of Long lasting Place in cases like this. (Pick Tr. -30:4.) Yet not, O.C.Grams. C.G.An excellent. 8-2-181 isnt applicable in this instance. Прочитать блог